Religion and Nasty Women
2:40pm–3:55pm
INTERNATIONAL HOUSE INTH DAVIS
Seat data provenance: Directory as of August 23, 2026 at 4:00 AM
Description
Used in 2016 by then presidential candidate, Donald Trump, in reference to his female opponent, Hillary Clinton, the phrase “nasty woman” has become a badge of honor and a rallying cry for women’s empowerment. The origin of the word “nasty,” attested in the 14th century, indicates highly unpleasant qualities- nauseating or unclean, in a literal or figurative way. It also came to evoke indecency and obscenity- and religious traditions have a long history of such depiction of women. After introducing some key texts on the otherness and objectification of women (including by Aristotle, Beauvoir, Kristeva, Nussbaum, and Butler), we will examine a number of female characters- goddesses, prostitutes, and virgins - in the Mesopotamian, Greek, Jewish, Christian, Buddhist, Hindu, and Islamic corpus that fit the definition of nasty. We will also analyze some of the underlying tropes of impurity and danger that characterize nastiness involving bodily fluids, sexuality, and knowledge. Spanning theology, literature, movies, and popular culture the course aims to be a survey of religious-based misogyny as well as women’s responses in their pursuit of agency
Reviews
Course experience
Aggregated across everyone who has taught this course.
No reviews matched yet.
Instructor quality
n=8, 2017–2025
Aggregated across every course Clemence C Boulouque has taught.
Teaching quality
4.5 / 5
Grading fairness
No signal
Workload
3.0 / 5 · Moderate
Difficulty
4.0 / 5 · Hard
Overall sentiment
In your week
Where it meets
Flat map — motion reduced
Workload and grading
- Grading
- Not published
- Format
- Not published
- Credits
- 4 credits
Reported workload
From CULPA and Reddit reviews matched to this course.
No reviews matched yet.